|
Overview
NA Process
Solutions
Region
Alaska
California
Great Lakes
Metro East Coast
Mid-Atlantic
Pacific Northwest
Southeast
Texas
Sector
Agriculture
Coastal Areas
Forests
Human Health
Water Resources |
Texas and the Southern Great Plains
THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON TEXAS AND THE SOUTHERN
GREAT PLAINS
Critical Findings for Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico from the First
National
Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and
Change
| Climate and changes in it – regardless of their cause – matter to
people, communities and businesses. Global warming is likely to bring many
changes to the nation. The United States as a whole is in a strong economic
position to adapt to many of these changes, but adaptation is often expensive,
not always possible or successful, and during transitions, ecosystems,
communities, and individuals could suffer. Moreover, national impact summaries
disguise local dislocations and disruptions to the ways we live, work and
recreate. Climate change adds a serious stress to our already threatened
resources and treasured places. Overall impact statements also mask significant
opportunities. To minimize the negative changes and make the most of the
positive changes we need to take a close look at how climate change will
affect each region. How will Texas and the Southern Great Plains experience
the effects of global warming? And how can we respond? |
Overview
Rapid changes in the economy, population, and building technologies
have dramatically reshaped the nature of weather and climate impacts in
Texas and surrounding states. In the 1950’s and 1960’s drought impacts
on water supply and agriculture were a serious hazard and large-scale threat
to the Texas economy. Today the population of the state is concentrated
in urban areas and the system of agricultural production is less vulnerable
to drought. Irrigation technologies, agribusiness consolidation,
and integration into a regional and global food supply system have reduced
some of the direct and indirect impacts of drought on the economy and employment.
However, groundwater resources from the Ogallala Aquifer are drawn down
at faster rates in some areas of Texas than precipitation and runoff can
replenish them. In addition, while threats to the food supply have diminished,
other threats related to weather and climate hazards have become more severe. For example, the combination of sea level rise and growth of coastal populations has increased the potential for serious damage associated with hurricanes. Thus, the National
Assessment and other scientific research currently under way conclude that
climate variability and change pose significant risks to urban water supplies,
coastal resources, and air quality in the region. This summary provides
details from these ongoing efforts.
Climate projections for Texas and the Southern Great Plains
In the Southern Great Plains, the 20th century temperature record shows
no consistent trend, except that in some areas winters and springs have experienced greater
seasonal warming, a trend that is expected to continue with global warming.
In addition, areas of the Southern Great Plains have already experienced significantly
more high intensity rainfall, which is also expected to accompany global warming.
Current climate models project significant regional temperature increases
by 2100, with especially high increases in the average summer heat index
(which combines temperature and humidity). Models also project a greater
number of heat waves – three days in a row above 90ºF – which cause
heat stress for people and livestock.
Projected changes in precipitation are bigger in the Canadian climate
model than in the Hadley Centre model, with decreases of up to 25% in an
area including the Oklahoma panhandle and northern Texas. Other areas might
actually see slight increases. However, increased evaporation due to rising
air temperatures are thought to result in net soil moisture declines, thus
negatively affecting farming and ranching.
Key Findings
Will there be water for Texas cities?
The vulnerability of both water supply and water quality to drought
remains a serious issue that could be significantly enhanced by climate
warming. The most serious consequences of future droughts will be
experienced in metropolitan areas and low-income rural populations.
Populations living along the Texas-Mexico border are especially vulnerable
due to extremely high levels of poverty, lack of infrastructure for water
supply and sanitation, and poor access to social services. Both groundwater
and surface water supplies along the border region are endangered by demands
that exceed supply and by multiple sources of contamination that increase
during periods of drought. Existing legal and institutional mechanisms
to deal with the consequences of drought are insufficient already and likely
to be wholly inadequate in an era of more frequent or intense climate variability.
Sea-level rise increases the risk of coastal disasters
Sea level is rising along the Texas coast due to global sea-level rise
and local subsidence. Most people living along the coast are aware
of the related coastal hazards from recent experience with hurricanes,
floods and coastal erosion. However, life along the coast offers some escape
from the hotter inland areas, which suggests that climate warming could
accelerate coastal development. The deadliest hurricane of the 20th
century caused enormous loss of life and property in Galveston, Texas.
In recent years, severe hurricanes have been less frequent along the Texas
coast, but the risk of significant damage due to coastal flooding and erosion
has increased due to relative sea-level rise and a continuing movement
of people and wealth into low-lying areas adjacent to coastal waters. For
example, Tropical Storm Frances in 1998 caused severe erosion and extensive
property damages in Galveston County. These trends portend a significant
increase in coastal property losses and reconstruction costs in future
years whether or not tropical storms increase in frequency or intensity.
The location of 23% of U.S. oil refining capacity along the Texas coastline
is a “wild card” in the suite of possible weather and climate impacts.
The effects of continuing sea-level rise combined with storm surges associated
with tropical storm events could shut down or damage an important component
of America’s refining capacity. A prolonged reduction in refining
capacity would damage both the local and national economy. In addition,
other research shows how coastal erosion poses a significant threat to
the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway – a transportation backbone of regional
and national significance. Continued commitment to channel protection is
required to avert erosion-related interruption of transportation and trade.
Other important economic and ecological assets in harm’s way along
the Texas coast include the Ports of Houston, Corpus Christi, and Brownsville
and ecological treasures like the Padre Island National Seashore and Laguna
Madre. The Laguna Madre is an ecologically unique coastal embayment
at the Texas-Mexico border, jointly managed by Mexico and the US.
Coastal flooding and/or flooding in the Lower Rio Grande river watershed
could wash large amounts of contaminated material from industrial and agricultural
sources into this sensitive ecosystem. High poverty levels leave
this region ill-prepared to mitigate or manage the potential impacts of
both extreme weather events or long-term climate change.
Will the Texas air crisis worsen?
Most large metropolitan areas in Texas currently face an air pollution
crisis. Millions of Texans live in unhealthy air. Houston,
the fourth largest city in the U.S., has become the smog capitol of the
nation. High temperatures enhance the formation of ground-level ozone
and other toxic chemicals associated with smog. Global warming will increase
the length of the already long smog season in Texas. Increasing temperatures
will also increase the demand for air conditioning, which will increase
the use of electricity, with consequent increases in emissions of smog-forming
gases from fossil fuel power plants. The health and legal consequences
of the failure of major Texas cities to comply with federal air quality
standards are a serious threat to the future human and economic health
of the state and region.
Adapting to the Potential Impacts of Global Warming
| Climate scientists agree that further climate change may be inevitable
and will therefore require adaptation, although most scientists also think
that the pace of climate change can be slowed by substantially reducing
greenhouse gas emissions. This would give governments, businesses, and
ecosystems around the world more time to respond and adapt to climate change
as well as reducing the overall severity of climate change-related impacts,
thereby buying "insurance" for an uncertain future. Another way to
buy insurance now is to incorporate climate change into all long-term decisions
about natural resources, thereby providing greater resilience. |
Reducing vulnerability to the severe water shortages that may occur
in a warmer world will require an acceleration of efforts to improve the
efficiency of use of irrigation water in agriculture and reductions in
urban water demand through vigorous conservation and efficiency initiatives.
Preliminary experiments with the pricing and marketing of water also show
great promise for enhancing the sustainability of future water supplies.
Texas’ recent efforts to address the state’s coastal erosion problems
will likely need to be extended in the future, and require either a long-term
financial commitment to protect developed eroding areas, and/or a strict
implementation of existing coastal laws that require retreat from the eroding
shoreline when structures come to be located on the public beach.
Likewise, efforts to set air pollution standards and to monitor and
enforce measures to reduce air pollution will need to be continued and
strengthened.
Additional Information
For more detailed information, the following expert is available to
answer your questions:
Dr. Robert Harriss, Chair of the Southern Great Plains Workshop Steering
Committee,
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
Tel: (303) 497-8106; E-mail: harriss@ucar.edu;
Web: http://www.esig.ucar.edu
Dr. Susanne Moser, Staff Scientist, Union of Concerned Scientists
Tel.: (617) 547-5552; E-mail: smoser@ucsusa.org
-
|